AI capabilities

What Artabel builds, and where it has been used.

A list of model families says little. What matters is whether the system is built and integrated, whether it was measured against the method it replaces, and whether it still runs two years later. This page is organised around those three questions.

Sectors

Domain by domain.

MedTech

Medical AI

Imaging and multimodal interpretation, clinical decision support, structured documentation, research workflows, dataset curation and quality auditing, and evaluation designed so a clinical reviewer will accept it.

Clinical governance is part of the team: where a system crosses from information tool into regulated medical device, and what has to be in place to survive certification, is a conversation we can have properly.

Industry

Industrial AI and operations

Predictive modelling and maintenance, anomaly detection, document intelligence, workflow automation, systems integration, instrumentation in hostile environments and real-time factory safety monitoring. Delivered into aluminium production, metallurgy and semiconductor manufacturing.

Agri-food

Agriculture and agri-food

Crop monitoring, quality analysis, multimodal sensing and data-driven decision support, including particle and bioaerosol classification. A domain where the cost of a wrong recommendation is a season, and where explainability is therefore not decoration.

Heritage

Culture, heritage and public knowledge

Source-grounded interpretation for museums and archives: ingestion of heterogeneous and partly analogue collections, rights-aware access, provenance and attribution, multilingual delivery, and interfaces the public uses unsupervised. The engineering is the same retrieval and document work as elsewhere; what differs is that the rights position changes record by record.

01 · Build

What we engineer.

Nine areas of capability.

Retrieval

Source-grounded retrieval and RAG

Ingestion, OCR, layout and metadata extraction across heterogeneous archives; hybrid lexical and semantic retrieval; generation that cites the passage it used. An unsupported assertion in generated output is treated as a defect.

Built and running: an eight-year corporate document archive with AI classification and analytics; an ongoing intelligent-document programme since 2023.

Vision

Computer vision and medical imaging

Classification, detection and segmentation on images that are noisy, scarce or clinically sensitive, with anatomical mapping, area quantification and observer-independent scoring.

Research reference: automated quantification of eczema lesions by anatomical region — fingertips, fingers, palms, dorsum, wrists — with the University Hospital of Basel.

Language

Speech, language and structured extraction

Speech recognition and structured documentation from professional dictation and consultation audio; entity and relation extraction from unstructured text into schemas your systems already use.

Research reference: automated transcription and summarisation of dermatology consultations, producing structured clinical documentation with human validation — with the University Hospital of Basel.

Prediction

Predictive modelling and time series

Forecasting, anomaly detection and remaining-life estimation from sensor and process data, evaluated against the cost of a false alarm and of a missed failure.

Delivered for Onsemi, a world-leading semiconductor manufacturer: aggregation of more than fifty sensor streams into AI-driven lifetime prediction for electrical parts.

Data-centric

Data-centric AI and dataset quality

Auditing a dataset before modelling it: off-topic samples, near-duplicates, label errors and the quality problems that silently cap what any model can achieve.

Research reference: large-scale automated cleaning of large data collections — detecting off-topic samples, near-duplicates and label errors at scale.

Synthetic

Synthetic and generative data

Generation of training and test material where real data cannot be shared, with metrics for fidelity, diversity, downstream utility and privacy leakage assessed separately.

Research reference: a project on synthetic-data benchmarking, developing evaluation metrics and comparative benchmarks.

Agents

Assistive agents under human authority

Task-scoped assistants inside a defined professional workflow: bounded tool access, explicit source attribution, a named human who approves before anything is released, and a manual fallback.

Research reference: automation of digital-forensics workflows, where each step is attributable and a qualified examiner approves the result.

Interfaces

3D, VR and immersive interfaces

Configurable 2D and 3D visualisation and immersive environments for teaching, research and technical inspection.

Edge & IoT

Smart devices, sensing and IoT

Instrumentation for hostile environments, real-time position and condition monitoring, and the integration that puts readings into the system of record rather than onto paper.

Delivered for the Technical University in Zvolen: an immersive 3D installation for the forestry department, built for university teaching.

02 · Evaluate

Evaluation and quality assurance.

Benchmark construction is a research discipline in its own right, and it is what answers the question every client eventually asks: is this better than what we do now?

What a defensible evaluation contains

  • A baseline that could beat us. The comparison is the manual process, the tool you already use, or a standard model with off-the-shelf retrieval — whichever is the real alternative to the work.
  • Acceptance criteria agreed before the work starts. What counts as good enough is settled and recorded first, so the target cannot drift towards whatever the system happens to achieve.
  • Judgement by qualified people. Quality is scored by practitioners against a pre-agreed rubric, with a second independent review for material decisions and output origin blinded where feasible.
  • No model scores its own output. Model-assisted scoring can support the analysis, but never provides the reference judgement, and generated output is never reused as ground truth.
  • A sample that fits the claim. How many repetitions a result needs depends on the task, how much it varies and how strong the claim is. Where the evidence is too thin to carry a number, the finding stays descriptive and is kept out of aggregate claims.
  • Uncertainty and support cost reported. Including how much hand-holding the system needed and how practitioners explained the results themselves.
  • Negative results kept. Stopped, failed and unaffordable cases stay in the record.
Quality is not traded for speed

A faster workflow that lowers professional quality does not pass acceptance. Speed is never the sole criterion.

03 · Deploy

Delivery and operations.

Artabel has been putting software into other organisations’ existing systems since 2004. The AI work is more recent; the integration and maintenance discipline is not.

Integration stack

Reusable engineering for data pipelines, APIs and connectors, role-based workflows, logging, automated testing and deployment. Built once and configured per client, so the same codebase is maintained rather than a separate copy for each.

Environments

Company-operated development, integration, testing and delivery environment with version-controlled repositories and separated test workflows. Compute and storage in Switzerland or the EU for routine AI workloads, with additional capacity added only where the workload, data location, security requirements and cost justify it.

Monitoring and MLOps

Dataset and model version control, task-level evaluation harnesses, error analysis, human-review queues, structured logging and deployment monitoring — so drift shows up on a dashboard before a user reports it.

Portability by contract

Mandatory export, documented interfaces, pre-approved alternative services and substitution testing. Any material change of provider, model version, data location or retention triggers reassessment.

Honest total cost

We document hosting, maintenance and support cost and hand over a total-cost-of-ownership profile. If the maintenance cost will not fit the budget available after the project, we say so while it can still be changed.

Handover

A named owner, a deployment guide, a support and incident route and a regression suite. The measure of a good handover is that the client can change the system without us.

04 · Govern

What you can show an auditor.

Assurance proportionate to risk: an internal drafting aid does not need the review depth of a clinical document. But every system we ship keeps the minimum record needed to reconstruct what it did and who approved it.

A governed AI workflow at Artabel Data rights and access constrain the whole pipeline. Sources feed ingestion and indexing, then modelling and retrieval, then a human review gate, then release with an evidence log. Evaluation runs underneath the whole chain and feeds corrections back into the model stage. Data rights, access and retention — settled before any technology is chosen Sources Ingest & index Model Human gate Release Documents, images,sensors, archives OCR, metadata,embeddings, schema Retrieval, prediction,grounded generation Named reviewercorrects or rejects Output plus a fullevidence trail manual fallback always available Evaluation runs underneath the whole chain Baseline comparison · task success · error frequency and severity · correction burden · cost per task · acceptance thresholds agreed in advance
Every Artabel deployment has this shape. The rights rail and the human gate are not optional extras added for regulated clients — they are what makes an AI output usable as professional work.
  • A named approver. A specific role signs off a release and can correct or reject it. Not "human oversight" as a principle — a person, in your organisation, with the authority to stop it.
  • A record of what ran. Purpose, data sources, service and model version recorded for every deployed system, so a result can be traced back months later.
  • Corrections logged. What the system got wrong, and how often, is recorded — which also tells you what it is costing your staff to correct.
  • EU AI Act and GDPR screening at workflow level, with escalation routes defined before go-live rather than after an incident.
  • No silent data export. Your data is not sent to general-purpose AI services without documented authority.
  • Accessibility verified by test for anything with a user interface.

How to start

Four ways to begin.

Feasibility sprint

Two to six weeks. One question, your data, and a written answer: what is achievable, what it would cost, and where it is likely to fail.

Build and validate

A working system plus the evaluation that shows whether it beats the current way of working, delivered as one package.

Independent evaluation

Someone else built it; you need a defensible verdict. Benchmark design, security, accessibility and deployment verification as a separate engagement.

Consortium partner

Artabel joins as a named beneficiary and carries engineering work packages, with deliverables, acceptance and audit-ready records.

Next step

Tell us what the task involves.

The interesting conversations start with the constraint that makes a project difficult — the data that cannot move, the quality bar that cannot slip, the deadline that cannot shift.