A Swiss engineering company Over twenty years in business

Engineering software that has to keep working.

Artabel is a Swiss engineering company. We build information systems, industrial instrumentation and applied AI for industry, healthcare and cultural institutions. Our oldest system has been in daily production at an aluminium plant since 2008.

2004 Swiss Aktiengesellschaft, continuously on the commercial register in Canton Schwyz
4 Areas of work: applied AI, enterprise software, systems integration, instrumentation
17 Years the Confal enterprise platform has run in daily production
PIC Registered with the European Commission as a participant, PIC 868921733

Where our systems run

Aluminium smelting · SK Semiconductor manufacturing University hospital dermatology · CH EPFL laboratory safety · CH Real-estate asset management · CH Technical university VR lab · SK Open-air heritage museum · CH

What we do

Four areas of work.

A model that works on a laptop is not a system. Artabel covers the modelling and the engineering that puts it into service — integration, access control, release, and the years of maintenance afterwards.

PRACTICE 01

Applied AI

Retrieval and document intelligence, computer vision, speech and structured extraction, predictive modelling, data-centric AI.

  • Source-grounded RAG
  • Medical & industrial imaging
  • Time series and forecasting
  • Dataset quality auditing
PRACTICE 02

Enterprise software

Configurable workflow and information systems with role-based access, approvals, reporting and analytics, built to be maintained for a decade.

  • Workflow & approvals
  • Document circulation
  • Reporting and dashboards
  • Long-run maintenance
PRACTICE 03

Systems integration

Connectors, APIs, data pipelines, migration and deployment into estates that were never designed to be connected.

  • API & connector engineering
  • Release and change control
  • Portability and export
  • Security & access design
PRACTICE 04

Instrumentation & 3D

Sensing and smart devices in hostile environments, real-time tracking, plus 3D visualisation and immersive interfaces.

  • Industrial IoT & robotics
  • Real-time monitoring
  • 3D and virtual reality
  • Training environments

Evaluation runs across all four

Baselines, benchmark design, error analysis and human-review protocols. Every piece of work is signed off against a measure agreed before it starts.

Programme delivery wraps them

Work-package leadership, deliverables on the month they are due, budget control, and the reporting and audit discipline European funders require.

Domain judgement on the project

Clinical governance for medical work, art history and digital humanities for heritage, and classical philology where sources are ancient. We name the specialists for an engagement before it is agreed.

Selected work

Three systems in service.

Client names, dates and what was delivered. The full list, including the engagements we cannot name, is on the work page.

01 — VRPIS · 2008–present

A configurable enterprise system, in continuous production for 17 years

Role-based workflow, document circulation and approval, procurement, inventory, logistics, accounting, reporting and external-system integration — deployed at Confal, Slovakia’s largest producer of aluminium alloys. Permissioned data flows, release control and auditability, in continuous use since 2008.

02 — LARA · EPFL Lausanne

An expert method turned into auditable decision-support software

Artabel translated a specialist laboratory risk-assessment methodology into structured data capture, transparent calculation logic, corrective-measure assessment and reportable output. Domain rules encoded so a human can inspect them; bounded decisions; explicit human authority at the point of judgement.

03 — Document intelligence · 2023–present

Source-grounded retrieval across a six-year archive

Ingestion, OCR and metadata extraction feeding semantic search, source-grounded generation and assisted analysis under human review — with AI-driven classification, reputation monitoring and a portfolio dashboard on top. Every answer carries a citation to the source document and page it came from.

Delivery footprint

Systems in production across Europe.

CH
Switzerland
Registered office, EPFL decision support, real-estate document AI
SK
Slovakia
Confal enterprise platform, Slovalco instrumentation and factory tracking, TU Zvolen immersive lab
INT
Beyond Europe
Semiconductor sector work

International project delivery

Engineering work packages in research consortia.

Artabel takes bounded engineering tasks in collaborative projects: interface specifications, a shared component built once and reused across pilot sites, integration and regression testing, and the deployment and cost documentation a review requires.

Shared engineering packages

One integration package, specified against the architecture the consortium agrees, tested for regression and fallback, then reused across pilot sites. Cheaper than rebuilding per partner, and comparable across cases.

Technical acceptance

Independent technical acceptance, security and accessibility verification, portability and export testing, a documented deployment guide and an honest maintenance and total-cost-of-ownership profile.

Programme administration

Separate task, time and cost records; declared conflicts and recusal; a single evidence register so no output or purchase is funded twice. Versioned releases and acceptance records, kept as the work proceeds.

Working in consortia

Engineering work packages in Horizon Europe consortia.

Artabel works in European collaborative research and is set up for it: registered with the European Commission as a participant, PIC 868921733, and organised to carry bounded engineering work packages in Horizon Europe consortia — interface specifications, a shared component built once and reused across pilot sites, integration and regression testing, and the deployment and cost documentation a review requires.

  • Built to the consortium architecture — the scientific partner owns the schema and the acceptance criteria; we implement against them.
  • Reuse over bespoke — one bounded package, many site configurations, with the maintenance cost stated.
  • Negative results kept — stopped and failed cases stay in the evidence set.
  • Human release gates — culturally or clinically sensitive material is published only on a named person’s approval.

Method

Evaluation is the part most projects skip.

Artabel’s practice is built on measurement: a baseline before the work starts, a benchmark that reflects the actual task, error analysis on the cases that matter, and a human review protocol for anything consequential.

The fields we work in — data-quality auditing, representation learning, benchmark construction, human–machine comparison under clinical conditions — are ones our director also publishes in academically. His university position is a separate appointment, described plainly on the research page; it is not a service Artabel sells.

Technical direction

Doctorate

PhD in artificial intelligence, University of Basel — deep learning in clinical dermatology, in collaboration with the University Hospital of Basel.

Prior degrees

MSc Computer Science, ETH Zürich. BSc Computer Science, EPFL.

Publication record

19 peer-reviewed publications, h-index 8, including work at NeurIPS and MICCAI and in the Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Funded research

Co-head of a Swiss National Science Foundation project on human and machine understanding of dermatologic conditions; lead of an Innosuisse project on synthetic-data benchmarking.

Earlier

Co-founder of a medical-device venture in India and of a data-science company in Dubai.

How an Artabel engagement runs

Scope, prototype, validate, implement.

Each stage has an exit condition and a decision point where stopping is a legitimate answer.

  1. Scope — the question before the technology

    We start from the task a person is actually doing, and how long it takes them today. What data exists, who owns it, what the rights and access constraints are, what a good answer looks like and who gets to say so. If AI is the wrong tool for the task, that conclusion is cheapest to reach at this stage.

  2. Prototype — feasibility on your data

    A working slice on your own material, sufficient to show failure modes, cost per task, latency, and how much correction work the system will create for your staff.

  3. Validate — against the current method

    The baseline is the existing manual process, the tool already in use, or a standard model. We measure task success, quality judged by qualified practitioners against agreed criteria, error frequency and severity, support burden and total cost. A faster workflow that lowers professional quality does not pass.

  4. Implement — deployed, documented, handed over

    Pilot deployment or integration into your stack, with role-based access, logging, approval gates, a manual fallback and a written deployment guide, so your own staff can operate and maintain it.

Next step

Tell us about the task.

A first conversation carries no charge or obligation. If you are assembling a consortium, we can provide a role description, an effort estimate and a partner profile within a week.